The Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Rapid Onsite Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions
Diagnostic Cytopathology, cilt.54, sa.1, ss.6-13, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 54 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1002/dc.70025
- Dergi Adı: Diagnostic Cytopathology
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.6-13
- Anahtar Kelimeler: diagnostic accuracy, fine needle aspiration, kidney lesions, rapid on-site evaluation, renal cytopathology
- İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background: Although core needle biopsy is widely preferred for evaluating renal lesions, fine needle aspiration (FNA) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains a valuable diagnostic method in selected cases. This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of renal FNA and highlight the impact of ROSE on achieving definitive diagnoses. Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients who underwent ultrasound- or CT-guided FNA for renal lesions between 2010 and 2018 at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine. Lesions were evaluated based on size, radiologic features, localization, ROSE status, and number of smears. Cytopathological results were categorized as nondiagnostic, limited, non-neoplastic, or neoplastic. Histopathological correlation was assessed in available cases. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Of the 273 cases, 218 (79.8%) yielded diagnostic results. Definitive diagnosis rates increased with lesion size and were significantly higher in solid (86.3%) and mixed (91.4%) lesions compared to cystic lesions (60%) (p = 0.001). ROSE was performed in 177 cases, significantly improving diagnostic yield compared to cases without ROSE (85.8% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.001). Histopathological follow-up was available in 119 cases, with an overall cytological–histological concordance of 84%, reaching 98% in cases with adequate material. Conclusion: Renal FNA remains a reliable and accurate diagnostic method when combined with ROSE, especially in well-sampled cases. It aids in identifying both primary and metastatic tumors and can guide clinical decision-making, particularly when surgery is not feasible.