Simplification of dosimetry in 90Y-radioembolization therapy by dual planar images


Creative Commons License

Abuqbeitah M., Akdağ Ö. T., DEMİR M., ASA S., SÖNMEZOĞLU K.

BMC cancer, cilt.22, sa.1, ss.1288, 2022 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 22 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1186/s12885-022-10392-y
  • Dergi Adı: BMC cancer
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1288
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: 90Y therapy, Absorbed dose, Attenuation & scatter correction, Dosimetry, LSF
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2022. The Author(s).AIM: The purpose was to provide a practical and effective method for performing reliable 90Y dosimetry based on 99mTc-MAA and SPEC/CT. The impact of scatter correction (SC) and attenuation correction (AC) on the injected 90Y activity, lung shunt fraction (LSF) and the delivered dose to lung and liver compartments was investigated within the scope of the study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen eligible patients (F: 3, M: 15) were subjected to 90Y therapy. 99mTc-MAA (111-222 MBq) was injected into the targeted liver, followed by whole-body scan (WBS) with peak-window at 140 keV (15% width) and one down-scatter window. SPECT/CT scan was subsequently acquired encompassing lung and liver regions. The LSFs were fashioned from standard WBS LSFwb (St), scatter corrected WBS LSFwb (Sc), only scatter corrected SPECT LSFspect (NoAC-SC) and SPECT/CT with attenuation and scatter correction LSFspect (AC-SC). The absorbed doses that would be delivered to tumor and injected healthy liver were estimated using different calculation modes involving AC-SC (SPECT/CT), NoAC-SC (SPECT), NoAC-NoSC+LSFwb (SC), AC-SC + LSFwb (St), and NoAC-NoSC+LSFwb (St). RESULTS: The average deviations (range) in LSF values between standard LSFwb (St) and those from SPECT/CT (AC-SC), SPECT (NoAC-SC), and LSFwb (SC) were - 50% (- 29/- 71), - 32% (- 8/- 67), and - 45% (- 13/80), respectively. The suggested 90Y activity (GBq/Gy) was decreased within a range of 2-11%, 1-9%, and 2-7% by using LSFspect (AC-SC), LSFspect (NoAC-SC), and LSFwb (SC), respectively. Overall, two-sample t-test yielded no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the absorbed doses to tumor and injected healthy liver between AC-SC (SPECT) and the rest of approaches with/and without AC and SC. However, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was demonstrated in the lung shunt fractions and lung doses due to AC and SC. The LSFs from scatter corrected planar images LSFwb (SC) exhibited well agreement (R2 = 0.92) with SPECT/CT (AC-SC) and there was no statistically significant difference (Pvalue > 0.05) between both methods. CONCLUSION: It was deduced that SPECT/CT with attenuation and scatter correction plays a crucial role in the measurements of lung shunt fraction and dose as well as the total number of 90Y treatments. However, the absorbed dose to tumors and injected healthy liver was minimally affected by AC and SC. Besides, a good agreement was observed between LSF datasets from SPECT/CT versus scatter corrected WBS that can be alternatively and effectively used in 90Y dosimetry.