REAL-WORLD DATA ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RAMUCIRUMAB PLUS PACLITAXEL EITHER ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY TREATED ADVANCED GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA


Creative Commons License

Köylü B., Kıkılı İ., Alan Ö., Selçukbiricik F., Laçin Ş.

14th International Gastrointestinal Cancers Conference (IGICC2024)), İstanbul, Türkiye, 28 Kasım - 01 Aralık 2024, ss.7-8, (Tam Metin Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Tam Metin Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.7-8
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The combination of ramucirumab(RAM) and paclitaxel(PTX) is the preferred second-line treatment regimen for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. However, the contribution of adding immunotherapy to this combination is unknown. In this study, we aimed to analyze the real-life data of the combination of RAM and PTX and to investigate the contribution of adding immunotherapy to this combination. Materials-Methods: From January 2018 to September 2024, clinical and pathological data from 46 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with RAM plus PTX, with or without immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI), in second-line or beyond were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Median age of the entire cohort was 50(range, 24- 85) and 46.7% of them were female. A majority of the patients’ tumors were characterized by diffuse histology(67.4%). HER2 status was negative in 93.5% of the patients. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) was observed in only one patient(2.2%), while 30.4% of patients had a PD-L1 CPS of >=1%. The percentages of the patients with synchronous and metachronous metastases were 73.9% and 26.1%, respectively. Patients with an ECOG performance score of 0 and 1 accounted for 63.0% and 29.3% of the entire cohort, respectively. The median number of RAM and PTX cycles was 4 (range, 1-12) for both agents. There were no significant differences in response rates and survival outcomes between patients who received RAM plus PTX(n=27) and those who received RAM plus PTX plus nivolumab(n=10) as second-line treatment (ORR 18.5% vs. 30%, p=0.57; DCR 55.6% vs. 80%, p=0.17; median PFS 4.3 vs. 3.1 months, p=0.85; median OS 7.8 vs. 9.6 months, p=0.64). In the third-line treatment(n=9), seven patients received RAM plus PTX, while only two patients received RAM plus PTX plus ICI(One patient received nivolumab, and the other received pembrolizumab). ORR and DCR were 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI 3.4-5.1 months) and the median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI 2.0-12.7 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that age>=50 years (OR 2.1 [95% CI 0.9-4.4], p=0.04) and the presence of ascites (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.2-5.5],p=0.01) were associated with poorer overall survival. The most commonly (>10%) experienced grade>=3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) while receiving RAM plus PTX (± ICI) were anemia (39.1%), neutropenia (32.6%), infections (19.6%), thrombocytopenia (13.0%), and alanine aminotransferase and/ or aspartate aminotransferase increase (10.9%). Four patients (10.8%) in second-line treatment and two patients (22.2%) in third-line treatment discontinued therapy due to TRAEs. Conclusion: Although the efficacy of RAM plus PTX as second-line treatment or beyond was comparable to previous studies, the incidence of grade>=3 TRAEs was notably higher than in clinical trials. In the second-line treatment, the addition of nivolumab to RAM plus PTX did not result in significantly improved response rates and survival outcomes. Keywords: Ramucirumab, paclitaxel, immunotherapy