Oral Simetikonun Kedilerde Pankreasın Sol Lobunun Ultrasonografik Görüntülenmesine Etkisi
Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, cilt.13, sa.3, ss.218-226, 2026 (TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 3
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.31196/huvfd.1956166
- Dergi Adı: Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.218-226
- İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet
Özet
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of oral simethicone administration on the
ultrasonographic visualization of the pancreas in cats by reducing gastrointestinal
gas-related artifacts. Ten mixed-breed cats without gastrointestinal complaints were
included in the study. The left pancreatic lobe was ultrasonographically examined
twice. Initial measurements were performed before oral simethicone administration
(T0). Subsequently, all cats received oral simethicone at a dose of 4 mg/kg, and
measurements were repeated 30 minutes later (T1). Ultrasonographic examinations
were performed using an Esaote MyLab™8 Vet ultrasound system. Left pancreatic
lobe thickness and pancreatic duct diameter, when visible, were recorded. Data
normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, which demonstrated a nonnormal
distribution. Therefore, measurements were analyzed using the Wilcoxon
signed-rank test. No statistically significant difference was observed between
pre- and post-simethicone measurements of the left pancreatic lobe (p>0.05). In
cases where the pancreas could not be adequately visualized before simethicone
administration, no marked improvement in image quality was observed after
administration. However, when the pancreas was visualized, measurements
remained consistent after treatment. The findings suggest that oral simethicone
administration alone does not substantially improve ultrasonographic visualization
of the pancreas in cats. Pancreatic visualization appears to be influenced not only
by gastrointestinal gas but also by multiple factors, including patient characteristics
and imaging conditions.