Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies


Pennells L., Kaptoge S., Wood A., Sweeting M., Zhao X., White I., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, cilt.40, sa.7, ss.621-633, 2019 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 40 Sayı: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy653
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.621-633
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cardiovascular disease, Risk prediction, Risk algorithms, Calibration, Discrimination, ASSOCIATION TASK-FORCE, PRIMARY PREVENTION, AMERICAN-COLLEGE, DISEASE RISK, STATIN USE, VALIDATION, PREDICTION, GUIDELINES, FRAMINGHAM, SCORES
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Aims There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied.