EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, cilt.40, sa.7, ss.621-633, 2019 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
Aims There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied.