Evaluation of Effect of Different Computed Tomography (CT) Scanning Protocols on Hounsfield Unit and Its Impact on Image Performance


Karaçam S., Aynacı B., Kısınma Azaklıoğlu D., Tunçman D., Kayhan E.

4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LIFE AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, İSTANBUL, TURKEY ICOLES 2021, İstanbul, Türkiye, 23 - 25 Eylül 2021, (Yayınlanmadı)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Yayınlanmadı
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet

Özet

Computerized treatment planning systems (TPSs) are used in external beam radiotherapy to generate beam shapes and dose distributions with the intent to maximize radiation doses to cancer cells while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy. TPS provides dose information for treatment plans using the electron density information obtained from computed tomography (CT). CT numbers or Hounsfield Unit (HU) and uniformity are important image quality parameters in quality control of CT systems. Therefore, the consistency of the data obtained in reference values is important for the reliability of dose accuracy. CT number from CT images provide information on the attenuation characteristics of  X- ray beam in a particular volume element in patient body with respect to that of water at a specific kVp. It is important to verify the effect of different CT scanning protocols on HU and its effect on dose calculation. This study was carried out to analyse the effect of different tube voltages (80-120 kVp) on HU for different materials in Catphan 600 phantom and their dosimetric impact on dose calculation in TPS. General Electric Discovery Computed Tomography was used to acquire CT images from the phantom.  Circular regions of interest (ROIs) were defined on the CT images of the phantom within the sensitometric inserts, and mean CT numbers for different materials (polystyrene, teflon, water, air) were obtained. For this test, Ipem Report 91 state a remedial level of 10 HU for the annual test and a suspension level of 30 HU for all tests frequencies relative to baseline values. IEC do not state tolerance levels for measurement of CT numbers from various materials. Measurements of all materials in this study were within 30 HU from the average value and only teflon were outside 10 HU. Uniformity was measured from upper, right, lower, left, and central regions in the phantom. In this study, it showed that different kVp settings show no important variation in the measured HU values.  It was observed that all measured values were compatible with the acceptance and limit values in both systems and were within ± 30 tolerance values. But the highest differencies was noted in case of high-density materials (teflon) and CT scan at the lowest kVp. Therefore, it can be concluded that the clinical practice with applying CT acquisition technique of 120 kVp is viable. The study also evaluated the precision and uniformity of CT scans performed at different times, and emphasized the importance of periodic quality control tests for image quality and treatment accuracy.