BIO Web of Conferences, cilt.129, ss.17025, 2024 (Düzenli olarak gerçekleştirilen hakemli kongrenin bildiri kitabı)
Aims:
This research aims to advance our understanding of the heterogenity of IPFP cells and detect
the presence of TCs by employing techniques such as immunohistochemistry and
immunofluorescence. Through the investigation of their morphology and identification of
telocytes in the IPFP stroma, this study endeavors to provide novel insights into IPFP
architecture and its implications for regenerative medicine.
Methods:
In this study, IPFP tissues were obtained from 5-10 patients preparing for knee replacement
surgery at Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic.
After obtainiing the specimen one small piece of it underwent tissue preparation procedures
for light microscopy and immunohistochemical staining was performed using CD34 which is
the most common marker for telocyte identification. The rest of the specimen was used for
cell culture from which these cells were isolated using tissue digestion agent such as
collagenase II and cell strainers of different diameters in order to separate them from other
stromal cells with the cell adhesion method and subculturing the media in which the telocytes
were present during 96 hours. The cells were photographed at different incubation times
such as at 24h, 48, and 96h and were examined under the inverted microscope. Finally the
cells resembling to telocytes with their long projections were analyzed by double
immunofluorescence staining used CD34/c- kit, CD34/vimentin, CD34/PDGFR- α and β, and
CD34/ α-SMA markers for telocyte identification. This comprehensive approach aimed to
illuminate telocyte presence and distribution in the IPFP stroma, offering future insights into
IPFP physiology and pathophysiology.
Results:
In this study, the existence of telocytes within the IPFP was identified by their different shape
and immunophenotypes. We identified telocytes by immunohistochemical analysis, labeling
with CD34, the most extensively utilized telocyte marker. We used immunofluorescence
analysis with double labeling of CD34/c-kit, CD34/vimentin, and CD34/PDGFR α and β,
CD34/α-SMA in order to distinguish these cells from fibroblasts and pericytes in cell culture.
We found out that TCs were strongly positive for CD34, PDGFR α and β, and vimentin and
weakly positive for α-SMA. On the other hand fibroblasts and were found to be CD34
negative, while strongly positive for vimentin and PDGFR α and β. Notably, our findings
delineate telocyte cells from fibroblasts and pericytes, underscoring their unique cellular
identity within the IPFP microenvironment. TCs were recognized for their long and thin
prolongations and small cell bodies primarily situated around blood vessels and dispersed
throughout the IPFP stroma.
Conclusion:
Our study adds greatly to our understanding of IPFP telocyte biology by shedding light on
their presence, distribution, and morphological properties. As a result, these cells have the
potential to be a unique progenitor cell source for cartilage regeneration, and they need full
attention from researchers in the tissue engineering field.