Patient’s perception of nurse–patient relationship as healing transformations scale: Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability: A methodological study
Mediterranean nursing and midwifery (Online), cilt.6, sa.1, 2026 (ESCI)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 6 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.65717/mnm.2026.25634
- Dergi Adı: Mediterranean nursing and midwifery (Online)
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective: This study aimed to
adapt the Patients’ Perception of Nurse–Patient Relationship as Healing
Transformations Scale for use in Turkish and to examine its psychometric
properties among hospitalized patients.
Method: A methodological design
was employed. The study included 263 inpatients receiving care in 3 public
hospitals across different regions of Türkiye. Data were collected between
August 25 and December 10, 2025, using a Patient Information Form and the
Patients’ Perception of Nurse–Patient Relationship as Healing Transformations
Scale. For the Turkish adaptation, language and content validity were first
assessed. Then, confirmatory, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses
were conducted, respectively. Reliability was evaluated through Cronbach’s
alpha and test–retest methods.
Results: The content validity
index of the scale was 1.00. Two items were removed from the scale because they
appeared in both factors. Principal component analysis resulted in a final
15-item, 2-factor structure that explained 80.24% of the total variance.
According to confirmatory factor analysis, the scale’s goodness-of-fit values
were found to be χ²/df=3.1, RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) =
0.090, GFI (goodness-of-fit index) = 0.890, AGFI (adjusted goodness-of-fit
index) = 0.846, SRMR (standardized mean square residual) = 0.036, NFI (normed
fit index) = 0.946, IFI (Incremental Fit Index) = 0.963, CFI (Comparative Fit
Index) =0.963, and TLI (Tucker Lewis Index) =0.955. The overall reliability of
the scale was α = 0.971. The item-total correlation values of the scale ranged
from 0.693 to 0.923. Test–retest analyses showed high correlations, ranging
from 0.851 to 0.865 for the subdimensions and 0.876 for the total scale.
According to the Turkish version of the scale scores, 96.6% of patients
perceived the nurse–patient relationship as healing and transformative.
Conclusion: The Turkish version
of the scale, with 15 items and 2 factors, is a valid and reliable instrument.
It can be used to assess patients’ perceptions of the healing transformation
that occurs in the nurse–patient relationship as a nursing care outcome.