Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
JOURNAL OF NURSOLOGY, cilt.26, sa.4, ss.307-328, 2023 (ESCI, Scopus, TRDizin)
Objective: This descriptive study (PROSPERO***) aimed to systematically examine the research on peer review in nursing education. Methods: Two independent researchers searched EbsCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and TR Dizin databases between May and December 2022 and examined nursing research articles published between 2012 and 2022. The reporting of the searches with different combinations of keywords through Boolean operators was carried out with the PRISMA checklist, data extraction form, and EndNote 20. Results: As a result of the review of 47 articles that met the inclusion criteria, it was found that the studies were generally non-experimental, mixed, and qualitative research designs and conducted abroad, and peer review was mostly used in the evaluation of clinical skills. The benefits of peer assessment were that it generally emphasized the advantages, students were satisfied with peer assessment, it supported learning and increased interaction, and the weaknesses were that peer assessment required a good preparation process, students felt partially uncomfortable, and assessment was difficult. Conclusion: As a result, it is important to support the strengths and improve the weaknesses of peer assessment in nursing education and to expand its use.