Relationship between survival and increased radiation dose to subventricular zone in glioblastoma is controversial.

Creative Commons License

Elicin O. , Inac E., Uzel E. K. , Karacam S. , Uzel Ö. E.

Journal of neuro-oncology, vol.118, no.2, pp.413-419, 2014 (Journal Indexed in SCI Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 118 Issue: 2
  • Publication Date: 2014
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s11060-014-1424-3
  • Title of Journal : Journal of neuro-oncology
  • Page Numbers: pp.413-419
  • Keywords: Glioblastoma, Radiotherapy, Radiation, Subventricular zone, Survival, Dose, CANCER STEM-CELL, ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE, NICHE, RADIOTHERAPY, IRRADIATION, CONCOMITANT, RECURRENCE


To test the hypothesis on prolonged survival in glioblastoma cases with increased subventricular zone (SVZ) radiation dose. Sixty glioblastoma cases were previously treated with adjuvant radiotherapy and Temozolamide. Ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral SVZs were contoured and their doses were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 24.5, 8.5 and 19.3 months respectively. Log-rank tests showed a statistically significant correlation between contralateral SVZ (cSVZ) dose > 59.2 Gy (75th percentile) and poor median PFS (10.37 [95 % CI 8.37-13.53] vs 7.1 [95 % CI 3.5-8.97] months, p = 0.009). cSVZ dose > 59.2 Gy was associated with poor OS in the subgroup with subtotal resection/biopsy (HR: 4.83 [95 % CI 1.71-13.97], p = 0.004). High ipsilateral SVZ dose of > 62.25 Gy (75th percentile) was associated with poor PFS in both subgroups of high performance status (HR: 2.58 [95 % CI 1.03-6.05], p = 0.044) and SVZ without tumoral contact (HR: 10.57 [95 % CI 2.04-49], p = 0.008). The effect of high cSVZ dose on PFS lost its statistical significance in multivariate Cox regression analysis. We report contradictory results compared to previous publications. Changing the clinical practice based on retrospective studies which even do not indicate consistent results among each other will be dangerous. We need carefully designed prospective randomized studies to evaluate any impact of radiation to SVZ in glioblastoma.