EVALUATION OF CLASS TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON THE REMEDIAL PROGRAM IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS (RPPS)


Balkan S., Küçüktepe C.

European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, vol.6, no.1, pp.116-137, 2021 (Peer-Reviewed Journal)

Abstract

Abstract:

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the remedial program first implemented in primary schools in the 2018-2019 school year on the basis of teacher opinions. To this end,  it  is  attempted  to  perform  a  holistic  analysis  of  the  opinions  of  the  class  teachers implementing the training program in their classes, its implementation stages, the grade levels covered by the program, the content of the book used in the implementation and its applicability, the place and time of the implementation and to provide some insights for future research. In the current study designed as a qualitative study, the purposive sampling  method  was  used  and  thus,  a  total  of  8  tenured  teachers  implementing  this program in their classes were selected. A semi-structured interview form was prepared to collect data and the data collected through this semi-structured interview form were analysed by using the descriptive analysis and content analysis techniques. The findings obtained from the analysis of the data revealed that the teachers evaluated the general objectives  of  RPPS  as  positive,  partially  positive  and  negative.  Although  they  did  not receive any in-service training while implementing the program, they did not encounter a general problem, and implemented the program in line with the information given to them. The teachers expressed different opinions about the objectives of the program and generally stated that the program should be started from the second grade onwards. The teachers made different  comments  on  the  content of  the  source  book  prepared  for  the program according to different modules and gave positive and negative opinions about its applicability. The teachers arranged the implementation steps according to their own knowledge   and   experience;   they   found   the   school   suitable   for   the   place   of implementation,   but   they   put   forward   different   opinions   about   the   time   of implementation. In  addition, the  teachers  presented  various  ideas on the  basis  of their experiences during the implementation.