Tezin Türü: Yüksek Lisans
Tezin Yürütüldüğü Kurum: İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi, Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümü, Türkiye
Tezin Onay Tarihi: 2020
Tezin Dili: İngilizce
Öğrenci: Safa Abdulbari Mohammed Nasher SAEED
Danışman: Dilek İnal
Özet:
Strategies are useful actions that lead towards successful completion
of any given task. There are various learning strategies that help language learners
enhance their learning and improve proficiency by allowing them tools for
active and self-directed involvement in the process. The implementation of
different learning strategies into pedagogical practices in EFL and ESL contexts
depend on the specifics of the tasks, learners’ needs and the knowledge of these
available tools that would accommodate a range of abilities, skills and
learning styles. Among studies in
English language learning there is a significant body of research focusing on
strategies employed for reading. The primary objective of this meta-analysis is
to determine the effectiveness of metacognitive reading strategies of EFL and
ESL learners. To that end, it aims to answer the following questions: (1) Which
metacognitive strategies are most frequently employed by EFL/ESL learners? (2)
What is the overall effectiveness of metacognitive reading strategies? (3) Is
there an effect of the gender of the reader on the utilization of metacognitive
reading strategies? The literature identified for the present analysis ranged between
the year 1985 to most recently published literature. The target group was
students from primary, secondary and post-secondary settings. Results of the
meta-analysis indicated that ESL/EFL students were equally likely to use ETR/reading
for meaning, monitoring, or no metacognitive reading strategies. In addition,
an examination of the frequency distribution for metacognitive reading strategies
suggests that female ESL/EFL were more likely to make inferences and
predictions, stop and reflect, and look backwards and forwards; on the other
hand, male ESL/EFL students were more likely to check understanding.